Back to Home page
33 DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIETY
June 1998, Vol. 27, N° 1
Transformation of the family farm: The case of three South Korean villages.
Scholars have presented diverse views concerning changes in Korean family farms. Marxian-oriented scholars insist either on the socioeconomic differentiation or on the pauperization of peasants. Some of those who have observed the persistence of peasants explain it in relation to family cycle, as did Chayanov, while others project the disorganization of family farms due to off-farm migration. Still others have noted collective efforts to develop agriculture and commercial farming by the modernization of agricultural production. Longitudinal data obtained from a revisit survey offer rare opportunities to examine all of these propositions at once. Examination of these data shows that the theory of Marxian class differentiation does not hold, and that small family farms have survived. This is not because the necessary labor has been supplied along the family cycle but rather that out-migration helped ease the man-land pressure. On the other hand, out-migration resulted in a considerable decrease in the number of farm households, but it is unlikely that all family farms will disappear in near future. By illustrating elements of change that do not support the above propositions, we have demonstrated factors leading to the peasant-into-farmer development. These factors are population growth, man-land pressure, changes in landholdings and farming scale, in- and out-migration, maximization of family labor, government efforts to develop agriculture, mechanization of agricultural production, and commercialization of farm products.
English - pp. 33-47.
H. Seok, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
(KOREA, AGRICULTURAL POPULATION, FARMING SYSTEMS, THEORY, LIFE CYCLE, RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION)
Who is my neighbor? Koreans' perceptions of Blacks and Latinos as employees, customers, and neighbors.
The purpose of this study is to explain why Korean store owners receive greater hostility and rejection from the black community than from the Latino community. To answer this question, I examine Korean store owners' perceptions of blacks and Latinos, and their relations with them as employees, customers, and neighbors. The data for this study come from a sample survey, conducted between December 1993 and March 1994, of 198 Korean store owners in the Koreatown and South Central sections of Los Angeles. A major finding is that the common nativity status of Koreans and Latinos tends to reduce feelings of social distance between the two groups, whereas the different nativity status of Koreans and blacks tends to increase the distance between them. Moreover, blacks' perceptions that they are hosts and deserve social and economic advancements before immigrants makes them more critical of Korean businesses in their neighborhoods than Latinos do.
English - pp. 49-75.
I.-J. Yoon, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
(UNITED STATES, KOREA, LATIN AMERICA, BLACKS, IMMIGRANTS, MIGRANT ASSIMILATION)
Back to Home page